<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The 8 sites that come up to dominate wine readership</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cellarer.com/best-wine-websites-2009-04/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cellarer.com/best-wine-websites-2009-04/</link>
	<description>Wine regions, food blogs, useful tips</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 06:37:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Estelle Platini</title>
		<link>http://blog.cellarer.com/best-wine-websites-2009-04/comment-page-1/#comment-3237</link>
		<dc:creator>Estelle Platini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 11:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cellarer.com/?p=240#comment-3237</guid>
		<description>Hello Martin,
Thank you for your thoughtful remarks.

&lt;b&gt;Valuations&lt;/b&gt; are on an arbitrary scale. You show that it is too low. So I&#039;ll raise all dollars by a consistent factor in the next issue. Nevertheless one should note that it&#039;s only the website that is assessed here. (The WineSpectator publishing arm is formally out of the scope.)

Your list of &lt;b&gt;missing sites&lt;/b&gt; is useful too. A few of them are not in English and this is why they will not appear.

I see the others more like &lt;b&gt;resources/webapps&lt;/b&gt; than author-driven sites. This is why they currently are not part of the contest. I am not so sure if this segregation is relevant. I will think about removing it: including the wine resources or the wine webapps. Or both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Martin,<br />
Thank you for your thoughtful remarks.</p>
<p><b>Valuations</b> are on an arbitrary scale. You show that it is too low. So I&#8217;ll raise all dollars by a consistent factor in the next issue. Nevertheless one should note that it&#8217;s only the website that is assessed here. (The WineSpectator publishing arm is formally out of the scope.)</p>
<p>Your list of <b>missing sites</b> is useful too. A few of them are not in English and this is why they will not appear.</p>
<p>I see the others more like <b>resources/webapps</b> than author-driven sites. This is why they currently are not part of the contest. I am not so sure if this segregation is relevant. I will think about removing it: including the wine resources or the wine webapps. Or both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://blog.cellarer.com/best-wine-websites-2009-04/comment-page-1/#comment-3225</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 23:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cellarer.com/?p=240#comment-3225</guid>
		<description>It is really useful to have a list like this. There are a bunch of top sites missing including; snooth, winezap, vinogusto,  cellartracker, wineaccess, vinogusto, verema, and (of course) Wine-Searcher.com .

PS: I will be in, if WineSpectator sell themselves for $54,000.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is really useful to have a list like this. There are a bunch of top sites missing including; snooth, winezap, vinogusto,  cellartracker, wineaccess, vinogusto, verema, and (of course) Wine-Searcher.com .</p>
<p>PS: I will be in, if WineSpectator sell themselves for $54,000.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Estelle Platini</title>
		<link>http://blog.cellarer.com/best-wine-websites-2009-04/comment-page-1/#comment-3219</link>
		<dc:creator>Estelle Platini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 14:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cellarer.com/?p=240#comment-3219</guid>
		<description>Stephen, Bill,
Thank you for mentioning your respective websites. They are on my radar. We&#039;ll see when they show on top.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen, Bill,<br />
Thank you for mentioning your respective websites. They are on my radar. We&#8217;ll see when they show on top.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Eyer</title>
		<link>http://blog.cellarer.com/best-wine-websites-2009-04/comment-page-1/#comment-3102</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Eyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 21:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cellarer.com/?p=240#comment-3102</guid>
		<description>I would love to have you take a look at the Cuvee Corner Wine Blog, so I may be included in the contest. My readership numbers are moving up nicely! I love the concept and salute the great amount of work that went into compiling a such a interesting evaluation tool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love to have you take a look at the Cuvee Corner Wine Blog, so I may be included in the contest. My readership numbers are moving up nicely! I love the concept and salute the great amount of work that went into compiling a such a interesting evaluation tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Reiss</title>
		<link>http://blog.cellarer.com/best-wine-websites-2009-04/comment-page-1/#comment-3101</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Reiss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 21:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cellarer.com/?p=240#comment-3101</guid>
		<description>I have mentioned before that you add my website, wineeducation.com. But I still do not show in your list. I am one of the largest (over 250 pages) and oldest (1995) wine websites. Using your metrics I get a 5 PageRank and Compete&#039;s Site Profile list traffic at over 4,000 (our internal logs show unique visits to be many, many times that). I would be interested to see where I rank on your list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have mentioned before that you add my website, wineeducation.com. But I still do not show in your list. I am one of the largest (over 250 pages) and oldest (1995) wine websites. Using your metrics I get a 5 PageRank and Compete&#8217;s Site Profile list traffic at over 4,000 (our internal logs show unique visits to be many, many times that). I would be interested to see where I rank on your list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Estelle Platini</title>
		<link>http://blog.cellarer.com/best-wine-websites-2009-04/comment-page-1/#comment-2973</link>
		<dc:creator>Estelle Platini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 09:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cellarer.com/?p=240#comment-2973</guid>
		<description>I would argue that Wine Twitters is not a site about wine but about wine internet personalities.
Indeed the 89 Project qualifies. It will appear in a future list. It currently does not have &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.cellarer.com/evaluation-of-sites/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;statistics&lt;/a&gt; high enough.
Thank you pointing these sites out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would argue that Wine Twitters is not a site about wine but about wine internet personalities.<br />
Indeed the 89 Project qualifies. It will appear in a future list. It currently does not have <a href="http://blog.cellarer.com/evaluation-of-sites/" rel="nofollow">statistics</a> high enough.<br />
Thank you pointing these sites out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dhonig</title>
		<link>http://blog.cellarer.com/best-wine-websites-2009-04/comment-page-1/#comment-2971</link>
		<dc:creator>dhonig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 15:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cellarer.com/?p=240#comment-2971</guid>
		<description>2 wine sites you&#039;re missing- The 89 Project (http://89project.blogspot.com) and Wine Twitters (http://winetwitter.blogspot.com).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2 wine sites you&#8217;re missing- The 89 Project (<a href="http://89project.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://89project.blogspot.com</a>) and Wine Twitters (<a href="http://winetwitter.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://winetwitter.blogspot.com</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

